Non-EU Crypto Firms Face Tight Limits on Bloc Operations

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has Proposed Tighter Limits on non-EU Crypto Firms Operating Inside the Bloc

In its latest proposal, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has called for firmer operating limits on non-EU crypto firms providing services inside the bloc. 

The proposal brought forward by the ESMA is intended to ensure that crypto firms based outside the EU are compliant with the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) passed last year

MiCA represents the first comprehensive set of rules in place for crypto markets in leading economies. The framework is intended to protect consumers’ digital assets and set clear boundaries in an industry where international borders have been difficult to police. 

MiCA: Full crypto compliance 

In its statement, the ESMA says: "The proposed guidance confirms ESMA's previous message that the provision of crypto-asset services by a third-country firm is limited under MiCA to cases where the client is the exclusive initiator of the service.

“This exemption should be understood as very narrowly framed and must be regarded as the exception. A firm cannot use it to bypass MiCA.”

Indeed, this suggests that cases in which a client of a non-EU crypto firm exclusively requests for and initiatives specific services of said firm, will be limited to exceptional circumstances where a crypto firm’s solicitation attempts are undeniably non-existent.

For example, a non-EU crypto firm could not rely on the exemption rule to offer subsequent services after being solicited by a customer. Only by being solicited in the same way again can an international firm offer its services. 

Of course, this may cause headaches for international crypto players when developing the right product and service compliance infrastructures, but, for the EU, it sends a clear message that MiCA should be taken seriously. 

ESMA: Protecting MiCA-compliant crypto firms

The purpose of tightening reverse solicitation rules (where a customer initiates a desire for a product/service), has two inferred purposes. 

The first, evidently, is to ensure that EU-based investors and MiCA-compliant crypto-asset service providers are actively protected from ‘undue incursions’ by non-EU and non-MiCA-compliant entities. 

This ensures a level playing field is maintained for crypto firms seeking to scale their now-regulated business inside the EU.

The second, perhaps more understated intention of the ESMA’s statement, is to encourage crypto firms outside of the EU to open a branch or subsidiary on European territory. 

Not only would this make compliance far simpler for international crypto bodies, but it would also grant access to what is currently the largest regulated crypto market in the world. 

How many crypto firms choose to play ball, though, and expand their operations into the EU, remains to be seen.

**************

Make sure you check out the latest edition of FinTech Magazine and also sign up to our global conference series – FinTech LIVE 2024

**************

FinTech Magazine is a BizClik brand.

Share

Featured Articles

Sustainability LIVE Net Zero: Sustainable Finance Insights

Financial services and banking executives have the opportunity to hear from the world’s biggest sustainability leaders discussing the future of Net Zero

EPAM: 96% of Consumers Happy With AI in Banking

EPAM Continuum has conducted its 2024 Consumer Banking Report, suggesting that 96% of consumers are happy with banks adopting AI

Bitcoin Reclaims US$1tn Valuation; the Bull Market is Here

Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, has hit the US$1tn valuation mark again after the cost of one Bitcoin jumped 22% to US$52,005

COMING SOON: Top 100 Women in FinTech 2024

Digital Payments

FinTech LIVE Dubai: Linoy Kidd, CIO at HSBC

Financial Services (FinServ)

NASDAQ: Banks Need Fintech Trust to Combat US$3tn in Fraud

Fraud & ID Verification