Sonatype examines lodash’s open source vulnerabilities

By William Girling
Share
In our next article on Sonatype’s Top 5 Open Source Vulnerabilities White Paper, we explore the vulnerabilities of lodash...

In our next article on Sonatype’s Top 5 Open Source Vulnerabilities White Paper, we explore the vulnerabilities of lodash

Ranked in fourth place on Sonatype’s list, lodash is a more modern release than Bouncycastle; it saw its initial release in April 2012 and finally a stable release in August 2020. 

A JavaScript library designed to help programmers write in a clearer, more manageable way, it has provided diverse utility functions (including ‘function’, ‘string’, ‘array’, ‘collection’ and more) across its release history.

“Lodash is a very popular Javascript library used by developers worldwide to simplify and consolidate their code,” said Sonatype in a recent blog post.

“Users of lodash are able to reap the benefits of more elegant code in less time by utilising the robust lodash library. However, what was created as a helpful feature for most, lends itself to an attack vector for bad actors if it isn’t managed properly.”

Attack mechanics and remediation procedure

According to Sonatype’s research, vulnerability CVE-2018-16487 stems from an apparently incomplete repair carried out on version 4.17.5 of lodash (CVE-2018-3721).

Lodash is particularly susceptible to ‘prototype pollution’: because Javascript is primarily a prototyping language, its functionality is geared towards the ability to quickly add new objects and properties.

Cyber attackers can exploit this function by inserting large quantities of incompatible objects in a short time frame, which can cause a DoS (denial of service) or RCE (remote code execution) response. 

To resolve the issue, Sonatype recommends users upgrade to version 4.17.11 of lodash, which contains a dedicated fix for the issue.

“If upgrading is not a viable option, some developers have chosen to protect against this vulnerability by replacing a property entirely (rather than recursively extending it) if the destination object doesn't have that property as its own,” it advises.

Furthermore, the company advises that fixing one of lodash’s properties wouldn’t necessarily guarantee that all others were equally protected. As such, users are advised to tread with caution to ensure the vulnerability is holistically resolved. 

Share

Featured Articles

Wave 2.0: How Smart Automation is Reshaping Banking

Expert Sutherland panel reveals how leading banks are cutting loan times by 50% and stopping fraud through AI and automation in this essential webinar

What EU AI Act Means for Governance in Financial Sector

Asset managers and fintechs face new compliance rules as €35m (US$36.2m) penalties loom for breaches of EU's sweeping AI regulations

How Visa Foundation and INCO Will Empower Female-led SMBs

The CatalyseHer programme will provide 500 women entrepreneurs with community building, expert training and micro-grants to support women-led businesses

Accelerating Claims with AI: From FNOL to Settlement

Financial Services (FinServ)

Mphasis: Open Banking Will Rewrite Financial DNA of Society

Financial Services (FinServ)

This Week’s Top 5 Stories in the Fintech Industry

Financial Services (FinServ)