Sonatype examines lodash’s open source vulnerabilities

By William Girling
In our next article on Sonatype’s Top 5 Open Source Vulnerabilities White Paper, we explore the vulnerabilities of lodash...

In our next article on Sonatype’s Top 5 Open Source Vulnerabilities White Paper, we explore the vulnerabilities of lodash

Ranked in fourth place on Sonatype’s list, lodash is a more modern release than Bouncycastle; it saw its initial release in April 2012 and finally a stable release in August 2020. 

A JavaScript library designed to help programmers write in a clearer, more manageable way, it has provided diverse utility functions (including ‘function’, ‘string’, ‘array’, ‘collection’ and more) across its release history.

“Lodash is a very popular Javascript library used by developers worldwide to simplify and consolidate their code,” said Sonatype in a recent blog post.

“Users of lodash are able to reap the benefits of more elegant code in less time by utilising the robust lodash library. However, what was created as a helpful feature for most, lends itself to an attack vector for bad actors if it isn’t managed properly.”

Attack mechanics and remediation procedure

According to Sonatype’s research, vulnerability CVE-2018-16487 stems from an apparently incomplete repair carried out on version 4.17.5 of lodash (CVE-2018-3721).

Lodash is particularly susceptible to ‘prototype pollution’: because Javascript is primarily a prototyping language, its functionality is geared towards the ability to quickly add new objects and properties.

Cyber attackers can exploit this function by inserting large quantities of incompatible objects in a short time frame, which can cause a DoS (denial of service) or RCE (remote code execution) response. 

To resolve the issue, Sonatype recommends users upgrade to version 4.17.11 of lodash, which contains a dedicated fix for the issue.

“If upgrading is not a viable option, some developers have chosen to protect against this vulnerability by replacing a property entirely (rather than recursively extending it) if the destination object doesn't have that property as its own,” it advises.

Furthermore, the company advises that fixing one of lodash’s properties wouldn’t necessarily guarantee that all others were equally protected. As such, users are advised to tread with caution to ensure the vulnerability is holistically resolved. 

Share

Featured Articles

Meta makes 2nd attempt at virtual currency with ‘Zuck Bucks'

Arthur Caplin, solicitor and specialist in tech and crypto regulatory matters at law firm BLM, discusses Meta’s latest venture into cryptocurrency.

What Technologies are Driving the Digital Wallet Trend?

The advance of technology is providing us with new ways to pay. So what are digital wallets, how do they work and what will their future look like?

Is the US$10bn Decacorn the new Unicorn for Fintechs?

There are now 35 decacorns worldwide (companies with a $10bn valuation) and some of the biggest are fintechs

Five Emerging Fintech Hubs to Watch in 2022

Financial Services (FinServ)

Why are Banks and Fintechs Entering the Metaverse?

Crypto

Hokk Finance CEO Lawrence Huston talks DeFi and Fintech

Crypto