A valuable lesson for fintechs on Wirecard’s suspension

By William Girling
Following the announcement that Wirecard AG had filed an application for insolvency proceedings, its suspension has been lifted...

Following the announcement that Wirecard AG had filed an application for insolvency proceedings, its suspension has been lifted.

In a story which quickly developed after the discovery of lost funds from the company’s balance sheet, fintechs in the UK may be on course for recovery, but there are still causes for concern and important lessons to learn from the incident. 

COVID-19: driving digital payments

In many ways, the Wirecard revelations have dampened what many consider to be a very exciting time for the acceleration of digital payments. 

Accenture noted in its ‘10 Ways COVID-19 Is Impacting Payments’ that “fintechs and startups [...] can capitalise on the unique conditions created by COVID-19; digital, embedded and mobile propositions, in particular, are expected to succeed in a remote-working economy.”

Mitigating the potential for contamination inherent with exchanging physical cash, digital payments have flourished globally, with surveys in some regions reporting a 30% increase

It should also be noted that health concerns aren’t the only reason for digital payment’s popularity: lower costs, faster services, greater convenience and a wider selection of product choices are all factors enticing customers to change their spending habits.

Maintaining popularity

However, there is a fundamental fintech weakness which the Wirecard suspension made apparent: the payments themselves. 

As noted by Business Insider, many fintechs that utilise app-based or digital payments often do not have the capacity to handle transactions themselves, unlike their high-street bank counterparts. As such, they depend on companies like Wirecard to act as a third-party for processing transactions.

Accordingly, when the suspension was enacted, customers of fintechs who used Wirecard for this purpose were left unable to access their accounts and money. These companies include ANNA Money and Pockit.

Customers were perturbed by immediate ‘lockdown’ on their finances, leading some to look closer at the realities of how some digital and neo banks operate. 

Although unlikely to stymie the overall popularity of fintechs known for their innovative services, the onus is now certainly placed on companies to behave and act in a transparent fashion with users. Failure to do so could risk backtracking on the healthy competition which fintechs are providing in the collective financial sector.

Jon Ostler, CEO of Finder.com, called the incident a “wakeup call” and hoped that openness and honesty would permeate the sector moving forward.


Featured Articles

FinTech LIVE London returns with packed show this November

FinTech LIVE London – the leading event in fintech, banking and financial services – is back with some top speakers and an action-packed agenda

Techstars' Eromosele on what makes a perfect elevator pitch

FinTech Magazine speaks with Techstars' Glory Eromosele about honing your pitch to investors and how the fundraising environment is changing for startups

Starling Bank Founder and CEO Anne Boden steps down

The Founder and CEO of Starling Bank, Anne Boden, has stepped down from her position as CEO to avoid conflict of interest concerns

Onfido acquires digital ID verification pioneer Airside

Financial Services (FinServ)

Ripple targeting crypto custody with $250mn deal for Metaco


Top 10 Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) at Fintech Companies

Financial Services (FinServ)